Click For Photo: https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2020/02/12/USAT/f20c3822-6f54-473a-88df-f4f94bb697ea-AP_Congress_Equal_Rights_Amendment.JPG?crop=3999,2250,x0,y566&width=3200&height=1801&format=pjpg&auto=webp
WASHINGTON – The House voted Thursday to remove the 1982 deadline for ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment for women, a move that is mostly symbolic as the Senate is not expected to follow suit and the ability of Congress to change the deadline has not been tested in the courts.
The House resolution was supported by five Republicans: John Curtis of Utah, Rodney Davis of Illinois, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Tom Reed of New York and Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey. No Democrat voted against the measure.
Vote - Weeks - Virginia - ? - ?
The 232 to 183 vote came weeks after Virginia became the 38th – and potentially pivotal – state to ratify the amendment.
But that came decades after the ratification deadline set by Congress when the amendment was coming close to passage in the 1970s.
Expiration - Date - Equality - California - Rep
“There can be no expiration date on equality," California Rep. Jackie, Speier, the lead sponsor of the resolution, argued on the House floor.
In addition to the legal uncertainty, however, the amendment also faces opposition from anti-abortion groups who believe it will lead to the removal of restrictions on abortion.
Rights - Americans - Everyone - Newborns - Rep
“If we want to discuss protecting rights for all Americans, it needs to pertain to everyone, including and especially newborns," said Rep. Carol Miller. The West Virginia Republican said the ERA would force government-funded health care providers to conduct abortions.
In the GOP-controlled Senate, Republicans Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska are backing a similar effort.
Senate - Majority - Leader - Mitch - McConnell
But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., was dismissive of the resolution when asked last week if he would allow it to come to the floor.
"I haven't thought about that," he said. "I am personally not a supporter, but I haven't thought about it."
Constitution - Change - Women - Rights - Law
If codified into the Constitution, the change would explicitly declare that women have equal rights under the law. Supporters say it's a...
Wake Up To Breaking News!