The NY Times’ Split Personality Presidential Endorsement

www.thenewamerican.com | 1/21/2020 | Selwyn Duke
jesse456jesse456 (Posted by) Level 3
Click For Photo: https://www.thenewamerican.com/media/k2/items/cache/c80d960711495707d6d30a64599c2e17_XL.jpg




The New York Times, the “paper of record” that was once Stalin’s mouthpiece, has just made news by giving us all the presidential endorsements fit to print. In a first not just for the paper but, perhaps, for any paper, it has chosen two candidates: Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.).

No, the Times isn’t recommending we become like ancient Sparta, which once had two kings; isn’t espousing a binatarian view of two persons in one commander in chief; and isn’t likely trying to help Democrats who vote twice. So what was the paper doing?

Punditry - Starters - Example - Times - Analysis

Amusing the punditry, for starters. As an example, the Times opens its analysis of Warren by calling her “a gifted storyteller.” Well, yeah, that is one way to describe the Prevaricating Pocahontas, whose short list of “stories” (i.e., lies) involves having American Indian heritage, losing a teaching position owing to pregnancy, plagiarizing a cookbook recipe, her father’s job, her parents’ elopement, and her son’s private schooling.

The Times also states, in kindly dismissing ex-vice president Joe Biden, that he’s 77 and that it’s “time for him to pass the torch to a new generation of political leaders.” Yet while the 70-year-old Warren certainly is more vibrant than punchy Joe, she’s not exactly a new generation (a half generation, maybe — or a new degeneration).

Fox - News - Howard - Kurtz - Analysis

But this may not matter because, writes Fox News’ Howard Kurtz in a credible analysis, the Times’ criticism of Warren and praise of Klobuchar make clear they want the latter.

Warren has “displayed ‘some questionable political instincts,’” explains Kurtz, quoting the paper’s profuse criticism of Warren. “She can sound like she sees ‘a universe of us-versus thems.’ She’s backed away from Medicare for All. She goes too far in ‘placing the blame for a host of maladies from climate change to gun violence...
(Excerpt) Read more at: www.thenewamerican.com
Wake Up To Breaking News!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome to Long Room!

Where The World Finds Its News!