SANITY: Trump Judicial Appointee Refuses to Use Transgender Child Predator’s Preferred Pronouns in Court

Big League Politics | 1/15/2020 | Shane Trejo
magiccastlemagiccastle (Posted by) Level 4
Click For Photo: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/pjimage-2020-01-15T183243.175.jpg







Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan, who was appointed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals by President Donald Trump, struck back against transgender insanity on Wednesday in a court case.

Norman Varner, a man who pleaded guilty to child porn charges in 2012, has since come out as transgender. He now demands special rights due to his gender transition, which he announced in 2015. He demanded that the court use female pronouns to address him, and call him by his preferred name of “Katherine Nicole Jett.”

Duncan - None - Majority - Opinion - Case

Duncan was having none of it while writing his majority opinion about the case.

“Norman Varner, federal prisoner # 18479-078, appeals the denial of his motion to change the name on his judgment of confinement to “Katherine Nicole Jett.” The district court denied the motion as meritless. We conclude that the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion and so vacate the court’s judgment. In conjunction with his appeal, Varner also moves that he be addressed with female pronouns. We will deny that motion,” Judge Duncan wrote.

Democrats - TREASON - Impeachment - Scam

Should Democrats be charged with TREASON for the impeachment scam?

He added that “no authority supports the proposition that we may require litigants, judges, court personnel, or anyone else to refer to gender-dyshoric litigants with pronouns matching their subjective gender identity.”

Judiciary - Undertaking - Judge - Duncan

“We decline to enlist the federal judiciary in this quixotic undertaking,” Judge Duncan concluded.

In a dissent to the majority opinion on the case, Judge James Dennis – a liberal appointee of former President Bill Clinton – claimed that Judge Duncan’s “advisory opinion is inappropriate, unnecessary, and beyond the purview of federal courts.”

Liberals - Callousness - Judge - Duncan - Opinion

Liberals are complaining about the supposed callousness of Judge Duncan’s opinion on social media as well, believing that the convicted child molester’s delusions should be coddled by the judiciary:

However, Judge Duncan’s points are relevant in an age where transgender insanity...
(Excerpt) Read more at: Big League Politics
Wake Up To Breaking News!
To despair is to turn your back on God, you can never despair.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome to Long Room!

Where The World Finds Its News!