Staying in Trump’s DC Hotel Does Not Equal Corruption. Here’s Another Possibility.

The Daily Signal | 10/3/2019 | Staff
joseph76joseph76 (Posted by) Level 3
Click For Photo:

Charles “Cully” Stimson is a leading expert in national security, homeland security, crime control, immigration, and drug policy at The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Legal and Judicial Studies. Read his research.

Hans von Spakovsky is an authority on a wide range of issues—including civil rights, civil justice, the First Amendment, immigration, the rule of law and government reform—as a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative. Read his research.

Jet-setters - Diplomats - Venture - Capitalists - Travelers

Why do so many international jet-setters, European diplomats, venture capitalists, and other well-heeled travelers stay at the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C.?

Could it have anything to do with the fact that it’s just better than virtually every other hotel in town?

Thought - Minds - People - Book - Rooms

Apparently, that thought has never crossed the minds of those who claim that people book rooms and events there simply to curry favor with—and enrich—President Donald Trump.

That assumption led House Democrats to hold yet another hearing Sept. 25 alleging that, because Trump is part-owner of the company that owns the hotel, he is violating the emoluments clause of the Constitution.

Nonsense - Steroids - Popularity - Hotel - Quality—and

That’s nonsense on steroids. The popularity of the hotel rests entirely on its quality—and the nonpolitical law of supply and demand.

Let’s stick to the facts, shall we?

Emoluments - Clause - Part - Ownership - Hotel

First, let’s see what the emoluments clause has to do with part ownership of a hotel.

The Framers of the Constitution didn’t like the fact that foreign monarchs gave American diplomats, such as Benjamin Franklin, valuable gifts to try to influence them. So, they put two provisions in the Constitution that prohibit federal officials from accepting gifts and emoluments from foreign governments, as well as from state governments or from the federal government.

Supreme - Court - Case - Emolument - Compensation

As the Supreme Court held in an 1850 case, an emolument was “compensation or pecuniary...
(Excerpt) Read more at: The Daily Signal
Wake Up To Breaking News!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome to Long Room!

Where The World Finds Its News!