Hey @NewYorker, I fixed the headline for you:— Michael E. Mann (@MichaelEMann) September 8, 2019
"What if we stopped pretending that false prophecies of unavoidable doom are anything other than crypto-denialist narratives that favor an agenda of inaction?" (see: https://t.co/b9YzeRvPe6)https://t.co/sBOLOd8BBp
This is grossly uninformed doomer bullshit. Jonathan Frazen is not a journalist and he doesn't interview people who work on these issues before writing about them. Why is the New Yorker publishing this nonsense? https://t.co/3sdg2S5eos— Aaron Huertas (@aaronhuertas) September 8, 2019
In 2015, Jonathan Franzen said that fighting climate change distracted us from saving birds.— Robinson Meyer (@yayitsrob) September 8, 2019
Now, he says that fighting climate change is ultimately fruitless and we should accept inevitable apocalypse.
What kind of lousy four years did this guy have!?!https://t.co/E6P1A3nRgh