Yale Professor Rejects Evolution, Argues Anti-Religious People Cannot Brush Aside Intelligent Design

Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion | 8/27/2019 | Mary Chastain
kims (Posted by) Level 3
Click For Photo: https://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Yale-Professor-Darwinism.png




“Darwin’s theory predicts that new life forms evolve gradually from old ones in a constantly branching, spreading tree of life,” the professor says in the paper. “Those brave new Cambrian creatures must therefore have had Precambrian predecessors, similar but not quite as fancy and sophisticated. They could not have all blown out suddenly, like a bunch of geysers.” He explains, “Each must have had a closely related predecessor, which must have had its own predecessors.”

Among many other reasons, Gelernter also points to the near impossibility of creating a functional stable protein. “Immense is so big, and tiny is so small, that neo-Darwinian evolution is — so far — a dead loss. Try to mutate your way from 150 links of gibberish to a working, useful protein and you are guaranteed to fail. Try it with ten mutations, a thousand, a million — you fail. The odds bury you. It can’t be done.”

Way

“I have to distinguish between the way I’ve been treated personally, which has...
(Excerpt) Read more at: Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion
Wake Up To Breaking News!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome to Long Room!

Where The World Finds Its News!