‘Do Something!’ Is Not Going To Stop Mass Shooters

The Federalist | 8/5/2019 | David Harsanyi
PinkPuffFairy (Posted by) Level 3
Click For Photo: https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Pelosi.jpg













Although mass shootings account for a fraction of gun deaths in America and gun homicides are at historic lows, the terroristic nature of these crimes make them especially traumatic and destructive. The murderers, predominately young white men and loners with hateful, but often confused, ideologies, can strike anywhere. And that puts them everywhere.

As much as people try to make sense of these events, to blame someone, these murders have no real or tangible objectives other than death. Mass shootings aren’t Donald Trump’s fault any more than they are Elizabeth Warren’s, despite the efforts of many in our parasitic political class to turn every drop of American blood into more votes.

Matter - Trend - Matter - Shooter - Manifestos

But no matter what trend is responsible, no matter what the shooter’s manifestos state, no matter how they got their weapons, gun controllers will attempt to shame Republicans into “doing something”—or, rather, anything gun controllers demand.

When House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claims Republican inaction “dishonors our solemn duty to protect innocent men, women and children and end this epidemic once and for all,” she is misleading the American people. She has no plan to protect innocent men, women, and children. She has a hashtag to placate them.

Days - Entails - Proposals - Nothing - Gun

These days, #DoSomething entails two proposals that would do nothing to mitigate gun homicides: “universal background checks” and a ban of “assault weapons.”

President Donald Trump wants “strong background checks.” Sen. Pat Toomey wants to pass his old bill to “expand background checks to all commercial firearm sales.” Democrats have already passed a bill doing just that in the House.

El - Paso - Dayton - Gunman - Weapon

As far as we know, neither the El Paso nor the Dayton gunman would have been stopped from purchasing a weapon by an “expanded” background check or any kind of background checks that didn’t have a pre-crime component. Neither shooter had a criminal record. In fact, I can’t...
(Excerpt) Read more at: The Federalist
Wake Up To Breaking News!
May you always have love to share, health to spare, and friends that care
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome to Long Room!

Where The World Finds Its News!