Click For Photo: https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/1024px-Trump_received_a_phone_call_from_Mike_Pompeo.jpg
Last year, a judge in the Southern District of New York ruled that, unlike every other person on earth, the president of the United States did not have the right to block people on Twitter. The decision in that case, Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump, and its flawed First Amendment reasoning were upheld yesterday by a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit, and look destined to be appealed to the Supreme Court.
In making Twitter into a public forum, the court has scrambled the conventional wisdom on what private social media companies can do with their sites. In the name of sticking it to the president, they may also have paved the way for congressional regulation of the social media giants.
District - Court - Decision - Year - Article
The President’s Twitter Account Is Public Property?
Company - Venue - District - Court - Ownership
How do we get from a private company to a state-owned physical venue? The district court got there by squinting at the ownership of the president’s Twitter account. As I wrote in 2018:
There is a lot of weight resting on that word ‘or.’ Clearly, Twitter is not owned by the government. There is hardly even a decent argument to say that the @realDonaldTrump account is owned by the government, any more than the President’s clothes, books, or other personal property is. All presidents own things in their individual capacity, and that ownership does not pass to...
Wake Up To Breaking News!
Never argue with an idiot, the spectators may not be able to differentiate between you.