Bias? New York Times calls pro-choice source and quotes pro-life source via social media

GetReligion | 6/24/2019 | Bobby Ross Jr.
Pumpkinajn (Posted by) Level 3
Click For Photo: http://static1.squarespace.com/static/52c2df7ae4b0d215dded86fd/536fab69e4b00b0fd2515399/5d1126b0c334320001c67842/1561407834581/static1.squarespace.jpg?format=1500w










In a Twitter post today, Matthew Hennessey, deputy op-ed editor for the Wall Street Journal, complained about a New York Times story on a British court ruling that a mentally disabled woman must have an abortion.

“Reporter calls abortion rights group for comment on big story but harvests pro-life quotes from social media. Another totally fair report from our great journalist advocate class,” Hennessey tweeted with obvious sarcasm.

Tweet - Phone - Call - Pro-lifers - Views

In a follow-up tweet, he added, “It’s almost — almost — as if making the phone call, talking to real pro-lifers and respectfully recording their views is so disgusting and legitimizing as to repel the average journalist.”

Before I analyze the Times story in question, a quick note on the case itself: The Catholic News Agency reports that the forced abortion has been overturned on appeal:

Hennessey - Complaint - Times - Times - Post

Back to Hennessey’s complaint, which has been retweeted 125 times and liked 272 times as I type this post: I’ve read numerous news reports over the years where I would have said “Amen!” and agreed wholeheartedly. In fact, in an email chain with my GetReligion colleagues, I called dibs on critiquing this story before reading it.

It seemed like a quick-and-easy case to make the highly relevant journalistic point that we often do here: That is, ample evidence supports the notion of rampant news media bias against abortion opponents, as noted in a classic Los Angeles Times series by the late David Shaw way back in 1990.

Case - Link - Hennessey - Story - Times

But in this case, after clicking the link, I had to wonder if Hennessey read the same story I did. Yes, it appears that the Times quoted the pro-life side via a social media post. And yet, the paper called the pro-choice side for comment.

However, the pro-life side was quoted first,...
(Excerpt) Read more at: GetReligion
Wake Up To Breaking News!
Tagged:
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome to Long Room!

Where The World Finds Its News!