Click For Photo: https://static.pjmedia.com/trending/user-content/51/files/2019/04/BushmasterAR15.sized-770x415xc.jpg
A panel of Connecticut judges ruled that nine victims of the Sandy Hook school shooting can sue Bushmaster despite a law that shields gun manufacturers from lawsuits.
The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) protects firearms companies from liability regarding the use of their product in a crime. Suing a gun manufacturer for criminal use of their product would be like suing a car company because a car they manufactured was involved in a vehicular homicide or used as transportation to a murder or assault.
But really, who cares about that when you have a political agenda?
PLCAA’s prohibitions notwithstanding, the Connecticut Supreme Court said the Sandy Hook plaintiffs could proceed with their lawsuit against Bushmaster. The plaintiffs, citing advertising materials that place the XM15 in a marital context and glorify its lethal capacity, say Bushmaster violated Connecticut’s unfair trade practices law because its marketing campaign for the weapon encouraged its use for illegal purposes.
State - Supreme - Court - Plaintiffs - Claim
The state Supreme Court said the plaintiffs can proceed on that claim under an exception to the PLCAA that sets aside immunity if a manufacturer breaks a law “applicable to the sale or marketing of the product.” The panel returned the case to a lower court for trial. The decision stunned pro-Second Amendment groups.
A marketing campaign for the weapon encouraged its use for illegal purposes? How many AR-15 — one of the most popular firearms on the market — owners are out there using their weapons like the Sandy Hook shooter? A tiny fraction of a percent. It doesn't...
Wake Up To Breaking News!