It begins: Connecticut Supreme Court rules gunmaker Remington can be sued over Newtown shooting

thenationalsentinel.com | 3/15/2019 | Staff
chicana948 (Posted by) Level 3
Click For Photo: https://i0.wp.com/thenationalsentinel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/sandy-hook-school.png?fit=300,200&ssl=1


Click For Photo: https://i0.wp.com/thenationalsentinel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/sandy-hook-school.png?fit=1175,784&ssl=1

One legal strategy the #neverguns Left has been pursuing in recent years in their attempt to neuter the Second Amendment and chill gun rights is to sue weapons makers in an attempt to hold them responsible for mass shootings.

Thanks to a decision Thursday by the Connecticut Supreme Court, Leftist anti-gunners are now one step closer to their objective.

Associated - Press - Court - Lawsuit - Gunmaker

As The Associated Press reported, a divided court ruled that a lawsuit against gunmaker Remington can proceed over the way the company marketed the rifle that was used to kill 20 children and six school officials at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012.

The AP noted:

Gun - Control - Ruling - Roadmap - Victims

Gun control advocates touted the ruling as providing a possible roadmap for victims of other mass shootings to circumvent a long-criticized federal law that shields gun manufacturers from liability in most cases when their products are used in crimes. Gun rights supporters bashed the decision as judicial activism and overreach.

In a 4-3 decision, justices reinstated a wrongful death lawsuit against Remington and overturned the ruling of a lower court judge, who said the entire lawsuit was prohibited by the 2005 federal law. The majority said that while most of the lawsuit’s claims were barred by the federal law, Remington could still be sued for alleged wrongful marketing under Connecticut law.

Regulation - Advertising - Public - Health - Safety

“The regulation of advertising that threatens the public’s health, safety, and morals has long been considered a core exercise of the states’ police powers,” Justice Richard Palmer wrote for the majority, noting he didn’t believe Congress envisioned complete immunity for gun-makers.

Translation: “I don’t care what law the federal government passed; I’m angry about guns and I’m going to allow this suit to proceed with the hopes that it’s successful.”

Ruling - Survivor - Incident - Relatives - People

The ruling means that a survivor of the incident along with the relatives of nine people killed at the school can...
(Excerpt) Read more at: thenationalsentinel.com
Wake Up To Breaking News!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome to Long Room!

Where The World Finds Its News!